Even some of the better second tier search engines may waste a big hunk
of change. In early November 2004 I tried using LookSmart. It sent me
twice as much traffic as Yahoo! Search Marketing and traffic from
LookSmart had a 95% bounce rate. That means that 19 of 20 site visitors
from LookSmart immediately left and I paid for a ton of garbage traffic.
The quality of traffic from smaller engines will vary from term to term, but
its best to go with the biggest guys off the start and then try some of the
smaller engines.
Serch engiene
Popular Posts
-
One thing that drivesmeto distraction is the way terminology is constantly misused in HTML. Very few of today’s working Web designers have...
-
Use <head> and <body> Appropriately Once your root elements are in place, you can add the head and body portions of your d...
-
In essence, IP multicasting is a function of the IP address in use by a particular “multicast group.” If a user wants to send an audio pr...
-
As you just learned, Yahoo!’s Web Search is powered by Google, which means you can use all of Google’s advanced search operators to const...
-
The great advantage of programming an animation is that it becomes dynamic. The images are not defined until run time. Instead of watchin...
-
The other approach—the one taken by the Yahoo! directory—is to have actual human beings physically look at each Web page and stick each on...
-
Okay, Yahoo! is known for its high-quality and well-organized Web directory. But when you use Yahoo!’s Web Search feature, you bypass the...
-
As you’re discovering, Yahoo! offers a variety of search options. There’s Yahoo! Web Search (via Google) and the Yahoo! directory, as well...
-
Since IP provides only simple delivery services, almost all of the problems with IP are related to delivery difficulties. Perhaps a netwo...
-
Just because you conduct one type of Yahoo! search doesn’t mean you can’t expand your query into other types of searches. It’s as easy as ...







0 comments:
Post a Comment